Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning
ኖቬም 2013 · Routledge
ኢ-መጽሐፍ
232
ገጾች
family_home
ብቁ
info
reportየተሰጡት ደረጃዎች እና ግምገማዎች የተረጋገጡ አይደሉም የበለጠ ለመረዳት
ስለዚህ ኢ-መጽሐፍ
Recent concerns with the evaluation of argumentation in informal logic and speech communication center around nondemonstrative arguments that lead to tentative or defeasible conclusions based on a balance of considerations. Such arguments do not appear to have structures of the kind traditionally identified with deductive and inductive reasoning, but are extremely common and are often called "plausible" or "presumptive," meaning that they are only provisionally acceptable even when they are correct. How is one to judge, by some clearly defined standard, whether such arguments are correct or not in a given instance? The answer lies in what are called argumentation schemes -- forms of argument (structures of inference) that enable one to identify and evaluate common types of argumentation in everyday discourse.
This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each. These two elements -- the scheme and the questions -- are then used to evaluate a given argument in a particular case in relation to a context of dialogue in which the argument occurred.
In recent writings on argumentation, there is a good deal of stress placed on how important argumentation schemes are in any attempt to evaluate common arguments in everyday reasoning as correct or fallacious, acceptable or questionable. However, the problem is that the literature thus far has not produced a precise and user-friendly enough analysis of the structures of the argumentation schemes themselves, nor have any of the documented accounts been as helpful, accessible, or systematic as they could be, especially in relation to presumptive reasoning. This book solves the problem by presenting the most common presumptive schemes in an orderly and clear way that makes them explicit and useful as precisely defined structures. As such, it will be an indispensable tool for researchers, students, and teachers in the areas of critical thinking, argumentation, speech communication, informal logic, and discourse analysis.
This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each. These two elements -- the scheme and the questions -- are then used to evaluate a given argument in a particular case in relation to a context of dialogue in which the argument occurred.
In recent writings on argumentation, there is a good deal of stress placed on how important argumentation schemes are in any attempt to evaluate common arguments in everyday reasoning as correct or fallacious, acceptable or questionable. However, the problem is that the literature thus far has not produced a precise and user-friendly enough analysis of the structures of the argumentation schemes themselves, nor have any of the documented accounts been as helpful, accessible, or systematic as they could be, especially in relation to presumptive reasoning. This book solves the problem by presenting the most common presumptive schemes in an orderly and clear way that makes them explicit and useful as precisely defined structures. As such, it will be an indispensable tool for researchers, students, and teachers in the areas of critical thinking, argumentation, speech communication, informal logic, and discourse analysis.
ለዚህ ኢ-መጽሐፍ ደረጃ ይስጡ
ምን እንደሚያስቡ ይንገሩን።
የንባብ መረጃ
ዘመናዊ ስልኮች እና ጡባዊዎች
የGoogle Play መጽሐፍት መተግበሪያውን ለAndroid እና iPad/iPhone ያውርዱ። ከእርስዎ መለያ ጋር በራስሰር ይመሳሰላል እና ባሉበት የትም ቦታ በመስመር ላይ እና ከመስመር ውጭ እንዲያነቡ ያስችልዎታል።
ላፕቶፖች እና ኮምፒውተሮች
የኮምፒውተርዎን ድር አሳሽ ተጠቅመው በGoogle Play ላይ የተገዙ ኦዲዮ መጽሐፍትን ማዳመጥ ይችላሉ።
ኢሪደሮች እና ሌሎች መሳሪያዎች
እንደ Kobo ኢ-አንባቢዎች ባሉ ኢ-ቀለም መሣሪያዎች ላይ ለማንበብ ፋይል አውርደው ወደ መሣሪያዎ ማስተላለፍ ይኖርብዎታል። ፋይሎቹን ወደሚደገፉ ኢ-አንባቢዎች ለማስተላለፍ ዝርዝር የእገዛ ማዕከል መመሪያዎቹን ይከተሉ።
